This newsgroup, commonly called clpmisc, is a technical newsgroup intended to be used for discussion of Perl related issues (except job postings), whether it be comments or questions.
As you would expect, clpmisc discussions are usually very technical in nature and there are conventions for conduct in technical newsgroups going somewhat beyond those in non-technical newsgroups.
The article at:
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
describes how to get answers from technical people in general.
This article describes things that you should, and should not, do to increase your chances of getting an answer to your Perl question. It is available in POD, HTML and plain text formats at:
http://www.augustmail.com/~tadmc/clpmisc.shtml
For more information about netiquette in general, see the ``Netiquette Guidelines'' at:
http://andrew2.andrew.cmu.edu/rfc/rfc1855.html
A note to newsgroup ``regulars'':
Do not use these guidelines as a "license to flame" or other meanness. It is possible that a poster is unaware of things discussed here. Give them the benefit of the doubt, and just help them learn how to post, rather than assume that they do know and are being the "bad kind" of Lazy.
A note about technical terms used here:
In this document, we use words like "must" and "should" as they're used in technical conversation (such as you will encounter in this newsgroup). When we say that you *must* do something, we mean that if you don't do that something, then it's unlikely that you will benefit much from this group. We're not bossing you around; we're making the point without lots of words.
Do NOT send email to the maintainer of these guidelines. It will be discarded unread. The guidelines belong to the newsgroup so all discussion should appear in the newsgroup. I am just the secretary that writes down the consensus of the group.
This section describes things that you must do before posting to clpmisc, in order to maximize your chances of getting meaningful replies to your inquiry and to avoid getting flamed for being lazy and trying to have others do your work.
The perl distribution includes documentation that is copied to your hard drive when you install perl. Also installed is a program for looking things up in that (and other) documentation named 'perldoc'.
You should either find out where the docs got installed on your
system, or use perldoc to find them for you. Type perldoc perldoc
to learn how to use perldoc itself. Type perldoc perl to start
reading Perl's standard documentation.
You can use the ``-q'' switch with perldoc to do a word search of the questions in the Perl FAQs.
It is not required, or even expected, that you actually read all of Perl's standard docs, only that you spend a few minutes searching them before posting.
Try doing a word-search in the standard docs for some words/phrases
taken from your problem statement or from your very carefully
worded Subject: header.
This section describes things that you really should do before posting to clpmisc.
One such searchable archive is:
http://groups.google.com/advanced_group_search
This section describes things that you can do before posting to clpmisc.
But you need to consider the source of such information: there are a lot of very poor Perl books and web sites, and several good ones too, of course.
There can be 200 messages in clpmisc in a single day. Nobody is going to read every article. They must decide somehow which articles they are going to read, and which they will skip.
Your post is in competition with 199 other posts. You need to ``win'' before a person who can help you will even read your question.
These sections describe how you can help keep your article from being one of the ``skipped'' ones.
Being able to ``partition'' a problem is an essential skill for effectively troubleshooting programming problems. If you don't get that right, you end up looking for answers in the wrong places.
It should be understood that you may not know that the root of your problem is not Perl-related (the two most frequent ones are CGI and Operating System related), so off-topic postings will happen from time to time. Be gracious when someone helps you find a better place to ask your question by pointing you to a more applicable newsgroup.
Spend them indicating what aspect of Perl others will find if they should decide to read your article.
Do not spend them indicating ``experience level'' (guru, newbie...).
Do not spend them pleading (please read, urgent, help!...).
Do not spend them on non-Subjects (Perl question, one-word Subject...)
For more information on choosing a Subject see ``Choosing Good Subject Lines'':
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/D/DM/DMR/subjects.post
Part of the beauty of newsgroup dynamics, is that you can contribute to the community with your very first post! If your choice of Subject leads a fellow Perler to find the thread you are starting, then even asking a question helps us all.
Intersperse your comments following each section of quoted text to which they relate. Unappreciated followup styles are referred to as ``top-posting'', ``Jeopardy'' (because the answer comes before the question), or ``TOFU'' (Text Over, Fullquote Under).
Reversing the chronology of the dialog makes it much harder to understand (some folks won't even read it if written in that style). For more information on quoting style, see:
http://web.presby.edu/~nnqadmin/nnq/nquote.html
Do not say: I have variable with ``foo\tbar'' in it.
Instead say: I have $var = ``foo\tbar'', or I have $var = 'foo\tbar', or I have $var = <DATA> (and show the data line).
You should not bother the hundreds/thousands of readers of the newsgroup without first seeing if a machine can help you find your problem. It is demeaning to be asked to do the work of a machine. It will annoy the readers of your article.
You can look up any of the messages that perl might issue to find out what the message means and how to resolve the potential mistake (perldoc perldiag). If you would like perl to look them up for you, you can put ``use diagnostics;'' near the top of your program.
First make a short (less than 20-30 lines) and complete program that illustrates the problem you are having. People should be able to run your program by copy/pasting the code from your article. (You will find that doing this step very often reveals your problem directly. Leading to an answer much more quickly and reliably than posting to Usenet.)
Describe precisely the input to your program. Also provide example input data for your program. If you need to show file input, use the __DATA__ token (perldata.pod) to provide the file contents inside of your Perl program.
Show the output (including the verbatim text of any messages) of your program.
Describe how you want the output to be different from what you are getting.
If you have no idea at all of how to code up your situation, be sure to at least describe the 2 things that you do know: input and desired output.
The first two below are symptoms of lots of FAQ asking here in clpmisc. It happens so often that folks will assume that it is happening yet again. If you have looked but not found, or found but didn't understand the docs, say so in your article.
If you are flamed for not checking when you did check, then just shrug it off (and take the answer that you got).
It is OK to ask for a copy of the answer to be emailed, but many will ignore such requests anyway. If you munge your address, you should never expect (or ask) to get email in response to a Usenet post.
Ask the question here, get the answer here (maybe).
But if you get upset, wait a while before writing your followup. I recommend waiting at least 30 minutes.
Tad McClellan <tadmc@augustmail.com> and many others on the comp.lang.perl.misc newsgroup.